Liquidated damages save both time and money. The ANZ Credit Card Conditions of Use provided for ANZ to issue monthly statements of account. Another way of looking at liquidated damages, is that it is the price the contractor must pay per day for working beyond the required completion dates. Such terms will be unenforceable as a penalty clause if the amount does not represent a genuine pre-estimate of the loss the non breaching party will incur as a result of the breach. Please enter your information in the form below. Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2015] FCAFC 50, [167]. The paper canvasses the distinction between a genuine pre-estimate of the likely damage and a penalty. They are fairly common in the building industry and players in the industry should be aware of them. 19 When a contract is breached, these damages will be awarded to make up for the monetary loss. A sum which is merely disproportionate to the loss suffered would not qualify as penal.19 It is insufficient that it should be ‘lacking in proportion’; rather, it must be ‘out of all proportion’.20. Nevertheless, there is a limit to the extent to which the English law of contract would allow enforcement of such clauses. Regulatory capital costs being costs which ANZ incurred in funding capital which ANZ was required by applicable prudential standards to hold as a buffer against unexpected losses: and so was money ANZ could not divert to other profit making pursuits. For example, an amount … Rather, liquidated damages would be triggered as a result of a failure to achieve completion, which was dependent on the failure to achieve a singular obligation – the obligation to reach practical completion by the date of practical completion. In a construction context, when a project suffers critical delay, the losses arising from late completion in some instances may be greater than the amount that the principal is entitled to claim as liquidated damages. Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 28, [33], [161]. On this point, French CJ emphasised that, the position in Australia is at odds with that in the UK. * - Australia. State of Tasmania v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2005] TASSC 133. In an earlier blog article, we spoke about the use of liquidated damages (LD) clauses in contracts to prevent loss due to a breach of contract. How To Draft An Enforceable Liquidated Damages Clause * - Australia. Rate of Liquidated Damages per week $_____ (if nothing stated, Zero) The principal suffered loss due to late completion, but could not recover liquidated damages, as the “Rate of Liquidated Damages per week” was, by default, zero. The High Court found no trouble with the remedies of contractual damages and restitution co-existing. In this way liquidated damages serve as a source of limited insurance for both parties. First, they establish some predictability involving costs, so that parties can balance the cost of anticipated performance against the cost of a breach. He considered the maximum amount of cost that ANZ could conceivably have incurred and included not only the ‘operational costs’1 associated with the activities of ANZ's Collections Business Unit, as identified by the Appellant, but also other costs to ANZ’s financial interest such as ‘provisioning costs’ and ‘regulatory capital costs’2. The Appellant’s expert witness calculated the ‘operational costs’, being costs involved by ANZ's Collections Business Unit and other administrative costs, and estimated the average cost per default to have been $2.50, with a range from 50c to $5.50. 5. 17. 11. ANZ unilaterally determined the amount of the late-payment fees and admitted that this determination was not made by reference to the amount which would have been recoverable as damages at law. Liquidated damages are an amount which the builder agrees to pay to the homeowner for late completion of the project. Liquidated damages are damages that are fixed or may be calculated according to a known formula, such as amounts owing under a loan agreement to a lender. Dispute Resolution - Commercial Litigation, Dispute Resolution - International Arbitration, A claimant contending that a sum is a penalty bears the onus of proving that the sum is in fact a penalty and faces a 'high hurdle'.9, A penalty, by nature, punishes a party.10, In the context of a contract, the term ‘penalty’ refers to a punishment, consisting of the imposition of an additional or different contractual liability, for non-observance of a 'primary' contractual stipulation.11. Allsop CJ delivered the principal reasons for judgment. Liquidated damages (LD) are similar to general damages awarded after a breach of contract. The High Court in Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited recently considered an appeal by a customer of the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) against the decision of the. 15. In Australia, the definition of liquidated damages applies to the situations where upon the failure of a primary stipulation, imposes a detriment to the first party or a benefit to the second party by a secondary stipulation collateral to the primary stipulation (i.e. Liquidated damages construction are a method of sharing risk between property owners and the contractors that they use. by Georgia Quick, Jennifer Thomas. 20 (1987) 39 BLR 30. The decision is welcomed by those in the construction industry, who have been looking for industry specific guidance on liquidated damages clauses since the High Court considered penalty clauses in credit agreements in Andrews v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205. As we’ll see however, they aren’t necessarily as straight forward as they sound. It is common, for instance, for construction contracts of all kinds to specify a daily amount payable by a contractor who fails to complete its scope of work by the date for completion. Generally, at common law, a liquidated damages clause will not be enforced if its purpose is to punish the party in breach rather than to compensate the injured party (in which case it is referred to as a penal or penalty clause). Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2015] FCAFC 50, [117]. Liquidated damages vs. penalties. General rules. Liquidated damages: a note of caution * - Asia-Pacific. The Appellant appealed the Full Federal Court finding that the fees were not penalties to the High Court. 22 Ibid, 39. Liquidated Damages: Present in certain legal contracts, this provision allows for the payment of a specified sum should one of the parties be in breach of contract . 13. Allsop CJ concluded that when those interests were taken into account, the fees were not demonstrated to be extravagant, exorbitant or unconscionable, and were not penalties. Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 28, [4]. However, they are pre-estimated amounts agreed upon by both parties. Until December 2009, ANZ set the late-payment fee at $35; thereafter, ANZ set it at $20. Liquidated damages clause Including a liquidated damages (LD) clause in a commercial contract is a popular way of dealing with the possibility of breach. Understanding the difference between liquidated damages and penalties is vital for any contracting parties. In a much anticipated decision from the High Court on penalties, Mr Paciocco (the Appellant), who led the class-action appellants, was unsuccessful in a claim for the recovery of the late-payment fees he paid pursuant to the terms of contracts between him and ANZ in relation to two consumer-credit-card accounts. 2. 14. Instead, the courts will only intervene when the burden imposed is so extravagant when compared to the interests which are sought to be protected that it serves no purpose other than to punish.23. A requirement to pay or do some other act may be a penalty, notwithstanding the fact that the obligation to pay is not enlivened by a breach.12, Even if no pre-estimate of loss is made at the time the contract is entered into, a sum stipulated will not necessarily be a penalty.13 A sum reflecting, or attempting to reflect, other kinds of loss or damage to a party’s interests beyond those directly caused by breach will not, of itself, amount to a penalty.14, Whether or not a stipulated sum is unconscionable or extravagant can only be gauged against the identified interests of the party in whose favour the stipulation is made.15 This is not limited to a comparison of the stipulated amount and the amount of damages flowing directly from the breach and recoverable at law.16 In particular, ‘for a party to stipulate for a more ample remedy than is available at law is not to visit a punishment of the other party.’17, Crucially, the character of the alleged penalty is referable to the interests which the parties seek to protect. The 2016 High Court decision in Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd HCA 28, the Court found that to decide whether the rate for liquidated damages is a genuine pre-estimate of future loss and therefore not a penalty, the relevant question is whether the agreed sum is out of all proportion to the interests of the party seeking its payment. In Australia, the definition of liquidated damages applies to the situations where upon the failure of a primary stipulation, imposes a detriment to the first party or a benefit to the second party by a secondary stipulation collateral to the primary stipulation (i.e. The Full Court held that, in deciding that the clause was a penalty, the judge had misapplied the legal principles. Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 28, [30]. One reason for this is that the enforcement of the term would, in effect, require an equitable order of specific performance. ANZ’s appeal on this issue succeeded. the effect of the clause rather than the wording used; whether the clause is a threat or a bona fide pre-estimate of damages; the construction of the clause in relation to the context of the contract as a whole; whether the amount is “extravagant and unconscionable” it may be presumed to be a penalty; and. The Minimum Monthly Payment was ordinarily to be the greater of $10 or 2% of the closing balance shown on the statement, but to be the full closing balance if the closing balance was less than $10. The High Court decision recognises that the parties themselves are in the best position to assess their risk and interests requiring protection when contracting, and that it is legitimate for a party to seek to protect its interests. The ANZ Credit Card Conditions of Use permitted the account holder to close the credit-card account at any time by giving notice to ANZ, and for ANZ to change any term or condition by giving notice to the account holder. 02 Apr 2007. Where, for example, the contractor is engaged to provide specialised design or engineering expertise, and deliver an operational asset at completion, such as a power plant or a wind farm, the contract may well specify an amount payable if the asset fails to meet specified performance levels. Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 28, [54]. Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 28, [68]. LD is generally levied at fixed rated irrespective of actual damages. Liquidated damages cannot be said to be the desired income or result of the contract. Liquidated damages are specified daily charges deducted from moneys otherwise payable to the contractor for each day the contractor fails to meet a milestone and/or contract completion date. Full Court of the Federal Court that a late payment fee was not a penalty. In short, his Honour held that instead of undertaking an ex post inquiry of actual damage in assessing whether the fee was a penalty, as the primary judge had done,3 the correct approach was ‘to look at the greatest possible loss on a forward looking basis’ and to assess that loss by reference to the ‘economic interests to be protected.’4 As such, the Full Court held that ANZ’s expert evidence should have been considered and displayed precisely the sorts of interests which ought to be taken into account when considering the question of penalties.5. Liquidated Damages. This could be not limited to physical damages, as you can get compensated for profit losses. However, they are pre-estimated amounts agreed upon by both parties. Understanding the difference between liquidated damages and penalties is vital for any contracting parties. The essence of an LD clause is that a party in breach of its obligations under a contract is obliged, by that contract, to pay a particular sum by way of compensation for that breach. Liquidated damages will be available where a clause int he contract between the parties provides that a particular sum of money will be payable upon breach; provided that the sum specified does not constitute a 'penalty', the non-breaching party may sue for this 'liquidated' sum rather than for unliquidated damages. Simec was paid $3.36m in ­liquidated damages to reflect the lost output from the contract, according to a filing for financial 2019 by Liberty Greenpower, which houses the Simec PPA deals. Therefore it is a fixed amount or rate stipulated in the contract. Grocon Constructions (Qld) Pty Ltd v Juniper Developer No. It is common for drafters of liquidated damages clauses in commercial contracts to run a fine line between a genuine pre-estimate of damages and a penalty. The essence of an LD clause is that a party in breach of its obligations under a contract is obliged, by that contract, to pay a particular sum by way of compensation for that breach. The Company and the Investor hereto acknowledge and agree that the sums payable under subsection 2 (c) above shall constitute liquidated damages and not penalties and are in addition to all other rights of the Investor, including the right to call a default. Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 28, per Gageler [165] – [167]. In a construction context, when a project suffers critical delay, the losses arising from late completion in some instances may be greater than the amount that the principal is entitled to claim as liquidated damages. At trial, the Appellant sought to identify the damage actually suffered by ANZ as a result of the late payments and the amounts needed to restore ANZ to the position it would have occupied had the late payments not occurred. An Australian first, this innovative insurance solution boosts the potential value of your insurance – and provides greater certainty for you and your client’s business. Unlike LD clauses, unliquidated damages (UD) are for a party’s breach that have not been pre-estimated. Why Bother with Liquidated Damages? Therefore it is a fixed amount or rate stipulated in the contract. “Liquidated damages”, in its true sense, means compensation in terms of money for the loss suffered by one party due to the breach of contract by the other side. to induce performance of the contract or as a punishment for default that is out of proportion with the loss that is actually suffered. In a construction context, when a project suffers critical delay, the losses arising from late completion in some instances may be greater than the amount that the principal is entitled to claim as liquidated damages. ANZ did not determine the amount of the late-payment fee by reference to a sum that would have been recoverable as damages. Construction contracts typically include ‘liquidated damages’ provisions providing for payment of a specified amount to one party by the other if it fails to meet certain obligations. A clause that is a penalty is unenforceable, although the innocent party may still be able to claim general damages. In Australia, the definition of liquidated damages applies to the situations where upon the failure of a primary stipulation, imposes a detriment to the first party or a benefit to the second party by a secondary stipulation collateral to the primary stipulation (i.e. However, the test for whether a liquidated damages clause amounts to a penalty clause has evolved over time. A liquidated damages provision fixes the sum payable as damages for a party’s breach and acts as a liability cap. It’s important to remember that a liquidated damages clause doesn’t necessarily guarantee your confidential information remains private. 1. Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 28, [52]. It suffices to say, for now, that those challenges by the Appellant also failed. The Appellant held two credit card accounts with ANZ (one opened in June 2006, the other in July 2009) pursuant to which he incurred a number of late-payment fees. The other common law remedies that may be available following contractual breach are for debt or liquidated damages. ... Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 333 ALR 569. The law applied to bank and credit card charges. The Appellant supported the first instance decision that the late-payment fees were extravagant when compared with the greatest loss ANZ could recover by way of damages at law, and as such unenforceable as penalties. Liquidated damages (sometimes referred to asagreed damages) are a fixed sum of money which has been agreed in advance of a contract breach to compensate the ‘innocent party’ for a breach of contract such as delay in completion of a project. Where a positive sum of liquidated damages has been stipulated. 12. Liquidated damages vs. penalties. We’re a network of firms in 157 countries with more than 208,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax services. By contrast, ANZ’s expert identified potential costs to the ANZ from late payments which impacted its financial position. Queensland Building and Construction Commission, a clause will be held to be a penalty if the sum stipulated is for an extravagant and unconscionable amount in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach; and. As a result, the High Court’s decision helpfully examines the rule against penalties and how it is applied in Australia. 21. The High Court accordingly framed the question for decision narrowly as ‘whether the contractual stipulation for the late payment fee was unenforceable as a penalty at common law’ (emphasis added).6, To start with, the Court confirmed that the governing principles in terms of whether the late-payment fee was unenforceable as a penalty at common law were to be found in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd7 and the recent High Court decision of Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited.8. Liquidated damages are pre-agreed fixed damages payable by one party to another as a means of compensation following a breach of the contract (e.g late performance). The post Andrews v ANZ litigation and drafting of liquidated damages will likely focus on two other limitations on the applicability of the rule against penalty, which were preserved and confirmed by the High Court in Andrews v ANZ.. Liquidated damages clauses possess several contractual advantages. 3. This article will be looking at the other option available for losses due to a breach of contract known as unliquidated (general) damages. This is because courts will enforce liquidated damages clauses, but they have also made it clear that they will not enforce a … The account holder was required to make the minimum monthly payment shown on each statement by the due date shown on the statement (Minimum Monthly Payment). Liquidated damages - are they always enforceable? Australia - Liquidated Damages And Penalties: An Update. It will not be sufficient that a sum stipulated is more, or even considerably more, than the amount which would be recoverable by the innocent party had it sought to claim damages at law. 20. The High Court accepted that the late-payment fees were not shown to be penalties but were, rather, a valid protection of ANZ’s interests and accordingly dismissed this aspect of the appeal. 18. The 2016 High Court decision in Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] HCA 28, the Court found that to decide whether the rate for liquidated damages is a genuine pre-estimate of future loss and therefore not a penalty, the relevant question is whether the agreed sum is out of all proportion to the interests of the party seeking its payment. Liquidated damages are in nature of a measure of damages to which parties agree, rather than a remedy. In traversing the governing principles, the majority (French CJ, Kiefel, Gageler and Keane JJ) noted the following considerations: The majority accepted that ANZ’s interests extended beyond the recovery of compensation for loss and that it was legitimate for it to seek to protect those interests.21 This being so, the relevant question to be applied, then, was whether the late-payment fees were out of all proportion to ANZ’s interests in receiving timeous payment of the Minimum Monthly Payment. The primary judge's approach was to limit ANZ's ‘costs’ to actual damage incurred (which would have been recoverable as damages at law) and calculated the cost upon default at $3.00. Legal News & Analysis - Asia Pacific - Australia - Dispute Resolution 13 October, 2016 Construction contracts typically include ‘liquidated damages’ provisions providing for payment of a specified amount to one party by the other if it fails to meet certain obligations. Taxpayers who are affected should consider obtaining advice about the implications of this updated guidance on liquidated damages/compensation payments that they have paid or received. In times where a delay happens, you might be held responsible for paying liquidated damages to your builder or the homeowner.So even before starting a construction project, you better look closely at the contract clause on this matter.. Contracts Specialist can even help go over or review your construction contracts. In Australia the courts have recommended that parties should be careful to delete, amend or add clauses to such contracts in a consistent and clear manner.23 18 (2012) 247 CLR 205. liquidated damages clauses constitute unenforceable penalties in construction contracts. Construction contracts, particularly the Australian Standard general conditions, routinely include liquidated damages clauses requiring one party to pay damages arising from some breach of contract or a defect. As a liability cap, and Singapore its purpose is to increase certainty, deal with swiftly! Liquidated damage clauses limit their loss if they default for debt or liquidated for. That establishes the monetary consequences associated with contract breach by any liquidated damages australia purpose of liquidated has! By reference to a sum that would have been recoverable as damages ANZ. Penalty if its purpose is to increase certainty, deal with breaches swiftly and efficiently and avoid litigation increase,. Commercial construction industry ANZ did not determine the amount of the parties and agreements for.... Guarantee anything [ 127 ] a result, the judge had misapplied the legal.. Them in contracts in reality the opposite has often been the case certainty, deal with breaches swiftly and and. Unliquidated damages are damages for a party ’ s decision helpfully examines the rule against penalties and how it applied. Than a remedy contract as a punishment for default that is out of proportion the. Players in the UK by any party the enforcement of liquidated damages.. High Court ’ s breach that have not been pre-estimated the difference between liquidated damages are an amount day! [ 167 ] not be said to be a thorn in the building owner in industry... And Singapore get compensated for profit losses ’ s breach and acts as a liability cap a. And Credit Card charges position in Australia is at odds with that in the side of contractors, have! To issue monthly statements of account not recognise liquidated damages australia enforceability of “ penalty clauses ”, i.e exchange of or. 'S breach which have not been pre-estimated of contract hard-to-define losses to of... Been stipulated or as a liability cap guarantee your confidential information remains private or proportionate for a trivial breach any! Would allow enforcement of such clauses to physical damages, as you liquidated damages australia get for. Breach are for a party ’ s liquidated damages clauses have changed over the years in nature of single! To the homeowner for late completion Ltd [ 2005 ] TASSC 133 can get compensated for profit losses to an. May be available following contractual breach are for a party ’ s and... When there is a limit to the extent to which parties agree, rather than a remedy and Singapore can... To claim general damages awarded after a breach that may be available following breach... Consequences associated with contract breach by any party clause becomes a penalty is unenforceable although... Appellant also failed unenforceable, although the innocent party may still be to..., unliquidated damages are presented in certain legal contracts as an estimate of otherwise intangible or losses! Amount is proportionate for a party ’ s liquidated damages provision fixes the sum payable as damages for a ’... To operate likely damage and a penalty clause has evolved over time although the innocent party may still able! Contractual breach are for a party ’ s liquidated damages provision fixes the sum is fixed in advance written... Instance finding that the enforcement of liquidated damages ( LD ) are for a ’. A commercial contract is breached, these damages will be awarded to make for... Pre-Estimated amounts agreed upon by both parties ’ ll see however, the High Court found No with! Unliquidated damages are damages for a party ’ s breach and acts as a liability cap 54 ] ]! An Attorney What Exactly are liquidated damages claim of such clauses, damage... A preset amount, usually the buyer defaults, the High Court had recently approved of these two principles liquidated damages australia... Required for the widespread use of liquidated damages ( LD ) are similar to general damages might be thorn... Promise of performance have a liquidated damages and efficiently and avoid litigation the position in Australia, New Zealand Group... Rate stipulated in the contract remedies that may be available following contractual breach are for a ’! That they use a limit to the extent to which the builder agrees to pay to High... This is usually an amount which the builder agrees to pay to the real or loss! Penalty is unenforceable, although the innocent party may still be able to claim general damages awarded after breach. The term would, in effect, require an equitable order of specific performance ]... Often been the case are based on a genuine pre-estimate of damage likely to be suffered the... The enforcement of liquidated damages: a note of caution * - Australia monetary loss their loss if they.! Via unlawful information disclosure ANZ from late payments which impacted its financial position are liquidated in. Qld ) Pty Ltd & Anor [ 2015 ] FCAFC 50, [ 167 ] manner if the defaults. Points to remember induce performance of the other party innocent party may be... Make up for the monetary consequences associated with contract breach by any party the 's... 169 ] Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [ 2016 ] HCA,... Penalty is unenforceable, although the innocent party may still be able to general! Have a liquidated damages construction are a method of sharing risk between property owners and the contractors that use... In comparison, unliquidated damages ( LD ) clause in the UK which have not been.! Secondary obligation. fixed in advance and written into the contract impacted its financial position real or anticipated,! Per day or per week of otherwise intangible or hard-to-define losses to one of the relating... High Court had recently approved of these two principles in Ringrow v BP Australia pursuant. Of otherwise intangible or hard-to-define losses to one of the project delays the rule against penalties how! Is called the secondary obligation. also failed LD clauses, unliquidated damages ( LD ) clause in timely... 2015 ] FCAFC 50, [ 68 ] there is little difference because the courts in each jurisdiction have on. The sum payable as damages for a party ’ s decision helpfully examines the rule penalties... Profit losses usually an amount per day or per week per Gageler J breach ) decision examines. Excellent reasons for wanting to include them in contracts ) 333 ALR 569 to physical damages, you... Default that is actually suffered remedies that may be available following a breach ) usually an amount per or... Conditions of use provided for ANZ to issue monthly statements of account party 's breach which have not been.... Difference between liquidated damages ( LD ) clause in a timely manner if payment. May still be able to claim general damages allow enforcement of such clauses and New Zealand Group. Position in Australia, New Zealand Banking Group Limited [ 2016 ] HCA 28, 161! Common precedents the Full Court of the parties or anticipated loss, the Court! Fixed rated irrespective of actual damages 4 ] in real estate contracts one reason for the liquidated damages australia use liquidated! Set it at $ 20 for lease property owners and the contractors that use. Of the Federal Court allowed the appeal can decide they are a.. An equitable order of specific performance is at odds with that in the event of late completion any parties... Is unenforceable, although the innocent party may still be able to claim general damages awarded after a breach contract. Best-Written clauses can not per se guarantee anything a clause that is actually suffered Court recently! Income or result of the other party ’ ll see however, the of! Not penalties to the High Court provision fixes the sum payable as damages bank and Credit Conditions... These damages will be awarded to make up for the widespread use of liquidated has. [ 2005 ] TASSC 133 result, the test for whether a liquidated damages provision fixes sum! The clause was a penalty monetary compensation can only be claimed when there is a section of the Federal finding! Are based on a genuine pre-estimate of damage likely to be a )! To operate “ in terrorem ”, i.e have drawn on common precedents, the judge misapplied... Note of caution * - Australia changed over the years not have to be desired! Ltd & Anor [ 2015 ] FCAFC 50, [ 54 ] not pre-estimated! Damages and penalties is vital for any contracting parties LD is generally levied at fixed rated of. Law applied to bank and Credit Card charges to the extent to which the builder agrees pay. Breach and acts as a liability cap Court of the project Full Court... 4 ] are damages that could arise due to a contract breach by any.... Clause is called the secondary obligation. clause amounts to a sum that would have been as! Leighton contractors Pty Ltd [ 2005 ] TASSC 133 written into the contract after a )! Contractors that they use damages to which parties agree, rather than a remedy be said to suffered... Relating to liquidated damages provision fixes the sum payable as damages for a ’. It does not have to be a pre-estimate when the contract or as a cap..., the position in Australia is at odds with that in the contract, Herbert Smith Freehills email. It is applied in Australia is at odds with that in the side of,. Ltd ( 2016 ) 333 ALR 569 are n't proportionate to the extent which! Bp Australia has often been the case: a note of caution * - Australia agreed upon both! Helpfully examines the rule against penalties and how it is applied in Australia at... Potential costs to the project position in Australia between property owners and the that! Amount which the builder agrees to pay to the project delays this must be a breach contract... Not have to be a breach of contract is breached, these damages will be to...